Definition
of REVIEW SITE, from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
A Review site is a website on which reviews can be posted about people,
businesses, products, or services. These sites may use Web 2.0 techniques to gather reviews from site users or may
employ professional writers to author reviews on the topic of concern for the site.
Review sites included first ConsumerDemocracy.com which introduced the
helpfulness ratings, then later Epinions.com[1] and Amazon.com.[2]
Review sites are generally supported by advertising. Some
business review sites may also allow businesses to pay for enhanced listings,
which do not affect the reviews and ratings. Product review sites may be
supported by providing affiliate links to the websites that
sell the reviewed items.
With the growing popularity of affiliate programs on the Internet, a new sort of review site has
emerged – the affiliate product review site. This type of site is usually
professionally designed and written to maximize conversions, and is used by
e-commerce marketers. It’s often based on a blog platform
like WordPress, has a privacy and contact page to
help with SEO,
and has commenting and interactivity turned off. It will also have an e-mail
gathering device in the form of an opt-in, or drop-down list to help the aspiring e-commerce business person build
an e-mail list to market to.
Because of the specialized marketing thrust of this type of
website, the reviews are not objective.[citation needed]
Criticism
Most review sites make little or no attempt to restrict
postings, or to verify the information in the reviews. Critics point out that
positive reviews are sometimes written by the businesses or individuals being
reviewed, while negative reviews may be written by competitors, disgruntled
employees, or anyone with a grudge against the business being reviewed. So
called “reputation management” firms may also submit false positive
reviews on behalf of businesses. In 2011, RateMDs.com and Yelp detected
dozens of positive reviews of doctors, submitted from the same IP addresses by
a firm called Medical Justice.[6]
Furthermore, studies of research methodology have shown that in
forums where people are able to post opinions publicly, group polarization
often occurs, and the result is very positive comments, very negative comments,
and little in between, meaning that those who would have been in the middle are
either silent or pulled to one extreme or the other.[7]
Another criticism against sites that rely on income from
businesses is that they are reluctant to post negative reviews since that
undermines their business model. This leads to a conflict of interest.[citation needed]
Response to criticism
Operators of most
review sites acknowledge that reviews may not be objective, and that ratings
may not be statistically valid. A FAQ[8] on the
Ratingz Inc websites states that, although the ratings are not statistically
valid, “They are a listing of opinions and should be judged as such. However,
we often receive emails stating that the ratings are uncannily accurate,
especially for businesses with over 100 ratings”.
Why
RateGoogle.com
Google has acted
like a killing machine to businesses. They have no parameters for writing
reviews and their careless process encourages users to negatively impact
business owners without a fair appeal process. For example, a malicious client
of my law firm wrote a negative review on our site www.rnnlawmd.com. Following the
posting of the review the same client also filed a bar complaint. The bar
complaint was immediately dismissed as the allegations were not founded in fact
or ethics. Upon the Maryland Tribunal for attorneys issues a letter of
dismissal that same letter was presented to Google as a means of removing the
review. Google ignored the letter from the Maryland Attorney Grievance
Commission and advised my office that we had to file a lawsuit to remove the
negative comments. That lawsuit took over one (1) to come to a conclusion.
Please note that I am a lawyer. What happens to individual business owners who
are not attorneys, how can they resolve their issues?
But by far,
Google is a business entity and yet there is no forum to review the services
they provide. Lets see how they will stack up under their own dictatorial rule.
Careless inadequate process to review negative comments
Google states in
relevant part that in order to remove a negative comment the following steps
must be taken:
How do you rate Google?
Rate Google
2 / 5Reviewer
{{ reviewsOverall }} / 5Users(0 votes)
What People Say
None
Summary
Definition of REVIEW SITE, from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
A Review site is a thesitewizard.com website on which reviews can be posted about people, businesses, products, or services. These sites may use Web 2.0 techniques to gather reviews from site users or may employ professional writers to author reviews on the topic of concern for the site. Review sites included first ConsumerDemocracy.com which introduced the helpfulness ratings, then later Epinions.com[1] and Amazon.com.[2]
Review sites are generally supported by advertising. Some business review sites may also allow businesses to pay for enhanced listings, which do not affect the reviews and ratings. Product review sites may be supported by providing affiliate links to the websites that sell the reviewed items.
With the growing popularity of affiliate programs on the Internet, a new sort of review site has emerged - the affiliate product review site. This type of site is usually professionally designed and written to maximize conversions, and is used by e-commerce marketers. It's often based on a blog platform like WordPress, has a privacy and contact page to help with SEO, and has commenting and interactivity turned off. It will also have an e-mail gathering device in the form of an opt-in, or drop-down list to help the aspiring e-commerce business person build an e-mail list to market to.
Because of the specialized marketing thrust of this type of website, the reviews are not objective.[citation needed]
Criticism
Most review sites make little or no attempt to restrict postings, or to verify the information in the reviews. Critics point out that positive reviews are sometimes written by the businesses or individuals being reviewed, while negative reviews may be written by competitors, disgruntled employees, or anyone with a grudge against the business being reviewed. So called "reputation management" firms may also submit false positive reviews on behalf of businesses. In 2011, RateMDs.com and Yelp detected dozens of positive reviews of doctors, submitted from the same IP addresses by a firm called Medical Justice.[6]
Furthermore, studies of research methodology have shown that in forums where people are able to post opinions publicly, group polarization often occurs, and the result is very positive comments, very negative comments, and little in between, meaning that those who would have been in the middle are either silent or pulled to one extreme or the other.[7]
Another criticism against sites that rely on income from businesses is that they are reluctant to post negative reviews since that undermines their business model. This leads to a conflict of interest.[citation needed]
Response to criticism
Operators of most review sites acknowledge that reviews may not be objective, and that ratings may not be statistically valid. A FAQ[8] on the Ratingz Inc websites states that, although the ratings are not statistically valid, “They are a listing of opinions and should be judged as such. However, we often receive emails stating that the ratings are uncannily accurate, especially for businesses with over 100 ratings".
Why RateGoogle.com
Google has acted like a killing machine to businesses. They have no parameters for writing reviews and their careless process encourages users to negatively impact business owners without a fair appeal process. For example, a malicious client of my law firm wrote a negative review on our site www.rnnlawmd.com. Following the posting of the review the same client also filed a bar complaint. The bar complaint was immediately dismissed as the allegations were not founded in fact or ethics. Upon the Maryland Tribunal for attorneys issues a letter of dismissal that same letter was presented to Google as a means of removing the review. Google ignored the letter from the Maryland Attorney Grievance Commission and advised my office that we had to file a lawsuit to remove the negative comments. That lawsuit took over one (1) to come to a conclusion. Please note that I am a lawyer. What happens to individual business owners who are not attorneys, how can they resolve their issues?
But by far, Google is a business entity and yet there is no forum to review the services they provide. Lets see how they will stack up under their own dictatorial rule.
Careless inadequate process to review negative comments
Google states in relevant part that in order to remove a negative comment the following steps must be taken:
How do you rate Google?
Definition
of REVIEW SITE, from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
A Review site is a website on which reviews can be posted about people, businesses, products, or services. These sites may use Web 2.0 techniques to gather reviews from site users or may employ professional writers to author reviews on the topic of concern for the site. Review sites included first ConsumerDemocracy.com which introduced the helpfulness ratings, then later Epinions.com[1] and Amazon.com.[2]
Review sites are generally supported by advertising. Some
business review sites may also allow businesses to pay for enhanced listings,
which do not affect the reviews and ratings. Product review sites may be
supported by providing affiliate links to the websites that
sell the reviewed items.
With the growing popularity of affiliate programs on the Internet, a new sort of review site has
emerged – the affiliate product review site. This type of site is usually
professionally designed and written to maximize conversions, and is used by
e-commerce marketers. It’s often based on a blog platform
like WordPress, has a privacy and contact page to
help with SEO,
and has commenting and interactivity turned off. It will also have an e-mail
gathering device in the form of an opt-in, or drop-down list to help the aspiring e-commerce business person build
an e-mail list to market to.
Because of the specialized marketing thrust of this type of
website, the reviews are not objective.[citation needed]
Criticism
Most review sites make little or no attempt to restrict
postings, or to verify the information in the reviews. Critics point out that
positive reviews are sometimes written by the businesses or individuals being
reviewed, while negative reviews may be written by competitors, disgruntled
employees, or anyone with a grudge against the business being reviewed. So
called “reputation management” firms may also submit false positive
reviews on behalf of businesses. In 2011, RateMDs.com and Yelp detected
dozens of positive reviews of doctors, submitted from the same IP addresses by
a firm called Medical Justice.[6]
Furthermore, studies of research methodology have shown that in
forums where people are able to post opinions publicly, group polarization
often occurs, and the result is very positive comments, very negative comments,
and little in between, meaning that those who would have been in the middle are
either silent or pulled to one extreme or the other.[7]
Another criticism against sites that rely on income from
businesses is that they are reluctant to post negative reviews since that
undermines their business model. This leads to a conflict of interest.[citation needed]
Response to criticism
Operators of most
review sites acknowledge that reviews may not be objective, and that ratings
may not be statistically valid. A FAQ[8] on the
Ratingz Inc websites states that, although the ratings are not statistically
valid, “They are a listing of opinions and should be judged as such. However,
we often receive emails stating that the ratings are uncannily accurate,
especially for businesses with over 100 ratings”.
Why
RateGoogle.com
Google has acted
like a killing machine to businesses. They have no parameters for writing
reviews and their careless process encourages users to negatively impact
business owners without a fair appeal process. For example, a malicious client
of my law firm wrote a negative review on our site www.rnnlawmd.com. Following the
posting of the review the same client also filed a bar complaint. The bar
complaint was immediately dismissed as the allegations were not founded in fact
or ethics. Upon the Maryland Tribunal for attorneys issues a letter of
dismissal that same letter was presented to Google as a means of removing the
review. Google ignored the letter from the Maryland Attorney Grievance
Commission and advised my office that we had to file a lawsuit to remove the
negative comments. That lawsuit took over one (1) to come to a conclusion.
Please note that I am a lawyer. What happens to individual business owners who
are not attorneys, how can they resolve their issues?
But by far,
Google is a business entity and yet there is no forum to review the services
they provide. Lets see how they will stack up under their own dictatorial rule.
Careless inadequate process to review negative comments
Google states in
relevant part that in order to remove a negative comment the following steps
must be taken:
